Limboy
80 后,现居杭州,曾就职于知乎、花瓣、蘑菇街、字节跳动等公司,专注于 Mac 和 Web 开发,喜欢尝试新事物,热衷创作,正在努力成为一个合格的独立开发者。

链接 更多 ≫

  • https://35mm.coffee/

    一个凌晨营业的线上咖啡馆

    3 days ago

  • https://antfu.me/photos

    Anthony Fu 拍的一些照片,真美

    4 days ago

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=251Blni2AE4

    Leonard Cohen - Who By Fire (Live in London)

    4 days ago

  • https://world.hey.com/dhh/apple-does-ai-as-microsoft-did-mobile-df2c98ca

    DHH 将 Apple 在 AI 领域的表现与微软在智能手机领域的表现做了对比,我觉得这个比喻非常贴切:两者都拥有市场垄断地位的产品,也都面临着可能颠覆未来的新兴技术,但在新技术领域的表现都显得有些乏力。苹果是否能在 AI 领域重振旗鼓,还挺期待的。

    7 days ago

  • https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/03/is-vibe-coding-with-ai-gnarly-or-reckless-maybe-some-of-both/

    Where vibe coding fails is in producing maintainable code for production settings. I firmly believe that as a developer you have to take accountability for the code you produce - if you're going to put your name to it you need to be confident that you understand how and why it works - ideally to the point that you can explain it to somebody else.

    Vibe coding your way to a production codebase is clearly a terrible idea. Most of the work we do as software engineers is about evolving existing systems, and for those the quality and understandability of the underlying code is crucial.

    For experiments and low-stake projects where you want to explore what's possible and build fun prototypes? Go wild! But stay aware of the very real risk that a good enough prototype often faces pressure to get pushed to production.

    If an LLM wrote every line of your code but you've reviewed, tested and understood it all, that's not vibe coding in my book - that's using an LLM as a typing assistant.

    受限于目前 LLM 的 ability 和 context window,Vibe Coding 更适合功能明确的一次性 App,如果涉及到持续迭代、调试,作为程序员必须要对代码有足够的了解。如果采用模块化设计,将 LLM 生成的代码「关」在模块内,这样即使生成的代码有问题,影响的范围也有限,而且也方便定位。

    9 days ago

  • https://nshipster.com/model-context-protocol/

    Language Server Protocol (LSP) revolutionized how programming languages integrate with developer tools. Model Context Protocol (MCP) aims to do the same for a new generation of AI tools.

    10 days ago

  • https://www.elmo.chat/

    这个 Chrome LLM 插件用着挺舒服的

    12 days ago

  • https://fxtwitter.com/EryouHao/status/1895372924544262397

    作者对于产品的初始用户(0-100)的分享,挺值得借鉴的。

    • 设置付费墙(允许全额退款),过滤真正想要用的用户。
    • 针对种子用户,建立群,沟通反馈和想法。
    • 手动发送邀请邮件,让用户感觉到有被特殊照顾。

    对用户真诚,对产品上心,是其中的奥义。

    18 days ago

  • https://fxtwitter.com/xiaokedada/status/1832794562261389787

    Cursor 的又一个妙用,纯文本在 AI 时代又焕发了新春。

    19 days ago

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3a6ZtEUOuM

    JJ Redick 真的很棒,隔着屏幕我都能感觉被激励到,而且是那种以身作则而不仅仅是简单的 pep talk,希望湖人这个赛季能走得更远。

    22 days ago

想法 更多 ≫

  • 昨天看完了第一季,挺不错的。设定很有意思,更有意思的是围绕设定设计的剧情,有点西部世界的感觉。如果通过记忆分割技术,将工作和生活完全分开,会是怎样的情景?个人的自由意志还存在吗?

    PS:Lumon 公司的画面看着非常苹果,简洁优雅。会二刷去品一品细节。

    1 day ago

  • YouTube 是典型的明明什么也没做,但忽然就变得比别的平台「崇高」了一点点的例子:

    • 依旧可以匿名访问 Channel / Playlist,也不会展示一个残缺版本。
    • 依旧提供 Channel / Playlist 的 RSS 链接。

    3 days ago

  • 饭否居然还活着,还能正常使用···

    3 days ago

  • 好的产品应该同时提供安全感和愉悦感,如果在这基础上能再多一些惊喜,就是一款优秀的产品。

    安全感:不太能做出意料之外、有破坏力的行为。前几天在用容器接净水器的水时,发生了大量的溢出(没有定量输出功能),这就是产品少做了一步,需要让用户去多做一步。还有就是如果不小心触发了这个行为,也有办法修复,比如邮件的撤销功能,或者 Photos 的 30 天后才会完全删除。

    愉悦感:在使用 Telegram 的过程中,就经常能感受到愉悦感。主要由设计、交互、动画来实现。

    惊喜:你没想到产品会提供这个功能,又被这个功能惊叹到。它要么让你变得更加便捷,或者带来了新的体验,或者避免了你犯错。然后你就会成为这个产品的忠实用户。

    6 days ago

  • 举几个 Cursor 不够智能的例子(w/ Sonnet 3.7):

    • 有一个 async function,其实只要 await 就接收 return value,就行了。但它偏不,就要用这个 Promise,在之后用到这个 value 的地方,都要解开这个 Promise 去 check value,再加上一通 try / catch / finally,导致代码变得异常臃肿。甚至上下文中,其他地方已经有正确的使用示例了,它却好像没看见一样。
    • Tauri 提供了 copyFile 方法,但它非要通过 sidecar 去 run 一个 cp,不仅更复杂,更重要的是这样不 work。
    • 代码中有一处会涉及到调用 Command,然后它用了 useState 去记录这个 Command,我告诉它这个其实用 useRef 更好,然后它还给我罗列了一堆理由,说确实 useRef 更好,那你为什么不一开始就用 useRef
    • 代码中会涉及到多个 Command 的串形调用,它在写代码时,就用了多个 Command 来记录,我告诉它,用一个就行了,结果还是一样,告诉我确实用一个就行了,罗列了一堆好处,那你为什么不一开始就这么做?!

    6 days ago

  • 较完整地体验 Cursor 后,最后还是打算回到 GitHub Copilot。AI Agent 在理解意图、找到完整的 Context、使用最新的 Document、写出优质代码这些事情上,还是不够理想(甚至差的很多)。

    在限定的 Scope 上,做目标明确的事情,才是目前的最佳实践。这样的话,Copilot 就刚刚好。

    6 days ago

  • 国内的产品/作品,往往给我一种感觉:这不是这个产品本该有的样子。通常这是能力和妥协(向上妥协和向下妥协)的双重结果。

    6 days ago

  • 下午跟欧文聊天,他提到了普鲁斯特问卷,共有 35 个问题,挺适合自己做一遍的。(标粗的是我觉得可以重点思考的)

    1. What is your idea of perfect happiness?
    2. What is your greatest fear?
    3. What is the trait you most deplore in yourself?
    4. What is the trait you most deplore in others?
    5. Which living person do you most admire?
    6. What is your greatest extravagance?
    7. What is your current state of mind?
    8. What do you consider the most overrated virtue?
    9. On what occasion do you lie?
    10. What do you most dislike about your appearance?
    11. Which living person do you most despise?
    12. What is the quality you most like in a man?
    13. What is the quality you most like in a woman?
    14. Which words or phrases do you most overuse?
    15. What or who is the greatest love of your life?
    16. When and where were you happiest?
    17. Which talent would you most like to have?
    18. If you could change one thing about yourself, what would it be?
    19. What do you consider your greatest achievement?
    20. If you were to die and come back as a person or a thing, what would it be?
    21. Where would you most like to live?
    22. What is your most treasured possession?
    23. What do you regard as the lowest depth of misery?
    24. What is your favorite occupation?
    25. What is your most marked characteristic?
    26. What do you most value in your friends?
    27. Who are your favorite writers?
    28. Who is your hero of fiction?
    29. Which historical figure do you most identify with?
    30. Who are your heroes in real life?
    31. What are your favorite names?
    32. What is it that you most dislike?
    33. What is your greatest regret?
    34. How would you like to die?
    35. What is your motto?

    7 days ago

  • 在 Mac (Apple Silicon) 上,whisper.cpp 比 openai/whisper 快了几乎一个数量级。

    7 days ago

  • 暗时间能做成的事可能超乎你想象

    7 days ago

随机音乐

Loading...

近 10 天心流状态 17h 0m

3.0h
8
4.0h
9
5.0h
10
1.0h
11
2.0h
13
2.0h
14