十多年过去了，还是觉得 posterous 的理念很棒，产品也足够简洁实用，但被 twitter 收购后，就关闭了，为什么没人再做一个类似的产品呢？

一个凌晨营业的线上咖啡馆

Anthony Fu 拍的一些照片，真美

Leonard Cohen - Who By Fire (Live in London)

DHH 将 Apple 在 AI 领域的表现与微软在智能手机领域的表现做了对比，我觉得这个比喻非常贴切：两者都拥有市场垄断地位的产品，也都面临着可能颠覆未来的新兴技术，但在新技术领域的表现都显得有些乏力。苹果是否能在 AI 领域重振旗鼓，还挺期待的。

Where vibe coding fails is in producing maintainable code for production settings. I firmly believe that as a developer you have to take accountability for the code you produce - if you're going to put your name to it you need to be confident that you understand how and why it works - ideally to the point that you can explain it to somebody else.

Vibe coding your way to a production codebase is clearly a terrible idea. Most of the work we do as software engineers is about evolving existing systems, and for those the quality and understandability of the underlying code is crucial.

For experiments and low-stake projects where you want to explore what's possible and build fun prototypes? Go wild! But stay aware of the very real risk that a good enough prototype often faces pressure to get pushed to production.

If an LLM wrote every line of your code but you've reviewed, tested and understood it all, that's not vibe coding in my book - that's using an LLM as a typing assistant.

受限于目前 LLM 的 ability 和 context window，Vibe Coding 更适合功能明确的一次性 App，如果涉及到持续迭代、调试，作为程序员必须要对代码有足够的了解。如果采用模块化设计，将 LLM 生成的代码「关」在模块内，这样即使生成的代码有问题，影响的范围也有限，而且也方便定位。

Language Server Protocol (LSP) revolutionized how programming languages integrate with developer tools. Model Context Protocol (MCP) aims to do the same for a new generation of AI tools.

这个 Chrome LLM 插件用着挺舒服的

作者对于产品的初始用户（0-100）的分享，挺值得借鉴的。

• 设置付费墙（允许全额退款），过滤真正想要用的用户。
• 针对种子用户，建立群，沟通反馈和想法。
• 手动发送邀请邮件，让用户感觉到有被特殊照顾。

对用户真诚，对产品上心，是其中的奥义。